Iran lawmaker says importer misdeclared cargo linked to Rajaei port blast
An Iranian lawmaker said the company that imported cargo linked to the Bandar Abbas port explosion misdeclared the goods to lower customs and storage costs, Iranian media reported on Monday.
"Some on social media said the importing company did not properly declare the shipment to reduce customs and storage fees. Our colleagues’ investigation confirms this," said Ebrahim Azizi, head of parliament’s national security and foreign policy commission, according to state television.
"It appears the importer’s declaration did not match the reality of the storage location," he said, adding that if the cargo had been classified as dangerous or requiring higher safety standards, "it should not have been stored in that area of the port."
Azizi said further investigation was needed into whether safety labels and hazard markings were properly used, the cargo’s exact contents, and whether proper safety rules were followed during unloading.
He stressed that final conclusions would require "technical work, expert review, and sufficient time" and warned against premature judgments.
Iranian Red Crescent rescuers work following an explosion at the Shahid Rajaee port in Bandar Abbas, Iran, April 27, 2025.
An Iranian lawmaker said the explosion at Shahid Rajaei Port in Bandar Abbas was caused by human error and poor safety measures, Iranian media reported on Tuesday.
"The recent incident at the port, involving high-risk export and import activities, shows that logistical systems and safety standards must be carefully evaluated before disasters happen," said Habib Ghassemi, a member of parliament’s construction commission, according to Borna News.
He added: "It appears a combination of human error and weak safety procedures, or possibly each on its own, caused this incident."
Iranian Red Crescent rescuers work following an explosion at the Shahid Rajaee port in Bandar Abbas, Iran, April 27, 2025.
Iran’s Writers Association said the government is using the word "incident" to avoid clear reporting and responsibility after explosions in Bandar Abbas.
"The authorities, who either cause disasters or worsen them, are now trying to hide behind the word 'incident' and dodge their duty to provide transparent information and answer public concerns," the group said in a statement.
The association, known in Persian as Kanoon-e Nevisandegan-e Iran, was banned two years after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Its members have faced systematic harassment and persecution for decades.
The group said public mourning has been tied to "dozens of unanswered questions" and criticized what it called "scattered images and contradictory official media reports," while "what has burned and been lost is the lives and existence of the people."
People walk after an explosion at the Shahid Rajaee port in Bandar Abbas, Iran, April 26, 2025.
Russia’s embassy in Tehran on Tuesday published a video showing a Russian plane dropping water over burning areas of Bandar Abbas, after Iranian officials said Russian planes were not used to fight the fire.
Earlier, Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni said Russian planes had arrived but were not needed. "Several planes from Russia have arrived and are stationed here, but they have not been needed so far. We thank them," he said on Monday.
Last week, Iran’s ambassador to Moscow, Kazem Jalali, said Russia sent three firefighting planes and rescue teams at Iran’s request.
The Russian embassy wrote that its emergency ministry, working closely with Iranian counterparts, carried out a "valuable and courageous" operation in Bandar Abbas.
Pierre Poilievre, a contender to become Canada’s next prime minister, has vowed to purge the country of “IRGC thugs” who, he says, feast on “stolen money from the Iranian people.” If elected on Monday, will he—or can he—deliver?
Poilievre asserted recently that about 700 operatives and affiliates of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which Canada has designated as a terrorist entity, must be tracked down and expelled.
But this was nothing new. He had expressed similar views in many speeches and interviews before. So what is different this time? How could rhetoric translate into action beyond gestural politics, built on a tenuous perception of Canada’s strategic leverage?
Poilievre and his caucus appear to have presumed that IRGC operatives would vanish the moment Canada listed the group.
Last June, when reports broke hours before the announcement, they erupted in a frenzy, lamenting the leak as if operatives were standing by the door moving assets in anticipation. Yet once the dust settled, everyone returned to their routines, leaving the world undisturbed.
With bells tolling for the Liberals after a lost decade, and the Conservatives hoping to be incoming sheriffs, they must face a deeper reality. Tehran’s reach is not a statistic but a network resistant to rhetoric. Something beyond grandstanding is inevitable.
The Myth of 700
First, one must ask: where did the 700 figure originate?
It came from an independent effort by a coalition named Stop IRGC, aimed at identifying those affiliated with the Islamic Republic who settled in Canada through legal channels. While notable, it was not government-backed and lacked security resources for verification. No intelligence assessment, inquiry, or briefing has substantiated it.
Poilievre nonetheless repeated it as fact, reducing complexity to a tally shaped by partisan urgency.
Mahmoudreza Khavari, senior Iranian official in Tehran (left) and Canada
I do not, for a second, believe the IRGC’s presence ends there. Years of inaction have turned lingering suspicion into undeniable reality. Activists, whether living in Canada or passing through, must now calculate their security risks.
Nor did operatives scramble to flee upon the listing. For Tehran’s fortune-brokers, Canada was never an obstacle. Even when the Conservative government had a chance over a decade ago to act against Mahmoud-Reza Khavari—a top Iranian banker who financed the IRGC’s missile program, embezzled billions, and fled to Canada—it turned a blind eye.
The regime and its IRGC presence are the product of sustained drift, allowing influence to fester across levels and seep into corners.
Beyond numbers: a real plan
Poilievre and his allies must recognize that strategy cannot rest on recital. A committed resolve is the only way to dismantle the IRGC’s hold. The Liberals never had one; when superficial action was taken, it collapsed under contradictions, punishing the wrong people.
A two-pronged strategy, I propose, is required to deal with the problem. First, focus on critical entities: IRGC and Basij members, operatives posing as civilians, financial networks, propaganda arms, and regime-linked organizations. Second, avoid actions that unjustly impact innocents.
A real strategy recognizes that IRGC operatives do not arrive in bloodstained green uniforms. They come as businessmen, investors, and tourists, traveling freely from the land they loot to the land where they hoard.
Any action has to hinge on the recognition that the IRGC and the Iranian state are one—indistinguishable in form, inseparable in purpose.
It is alarming that last December, an IRGC-affiliated news agency boasted of a “private sector” bypassing sanctions, especially in Canada. Individuals from a Canadian-registered nonprofit were interviewed on “innovative solutions” to do so.
This same group hosts webinars on exporting oil, gas, and petrochemical products, claiming collaboration with Iran’s Ministry of Industry—whose officials are sanctioned and banned from entering Canada for human rights violations.
Collaboration with entities sustaining the power structure of the Islamic Republic cannot be permitted under the pretense of legitimacy. Targeting the theocracy means little if you enable the institutions that sustain it.
Tehran’s playbook has long capitalized on Canada’s strategic vulnerability. The story is not about mythical figures who once slipped through. It is about a decades-old infiltration campaign that has unsettled our foundations from within.
Has Poilievre assigned the color of his cards before the real test calls?
Poilievre’s true test
If the Conservatives take power, let them not chase ghosts. Let them identify a handful of real, high-profile regime and IRGC operatives, transparently held accountable in full view of the public. That alone would shake Canada’s quiet standing as a sanctuary for tyranny’s enforcers more than any grand arithmetic of slogans.
The duplicity of senior Iranian officials in Canada offers a case study in calculated deceit—silencing hearings, disclaiming crimes, vanishing when accountability nears. Sadly, even rare breakthroughs fade under a Liberal establishment where secrecy lingers and accountability bends.
For any future leadership to set a real precedent, groundwork must begin before power is seized. Not hours before a designation. Not weeks into a mandate.
As a powerful voting bloc, the Iranian-Canadian community appears to be moving towards the Conservatives to turn the page on staged politics. For years, those in charge sold them a political vaudeville called a pie in the sky on Canada’s political Broadway.
If Poilievre plans to peddle another ticket to the same tired show, he should know: not a single seat will be sold. No more.
A committee investigating the explosions at Rajaei port announced in a statement that "negligence in observing safety protocols and passive defense measures has been confirmed."
The statement added, "There have also been instances of false reporting, and security and judicial agencies are actively working to identify those responsible."
The committee further noted, "A definitive determination of the cause of the incident requires a comprehensive investigation of all aspects, which, due to technical requirements, must go through detailed technical and laboratory processes."
