• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Iran’s ex-atomic chief says nuclear targets dispersed across country

Apr 4, 2025, 12:33 GMT+1Updated: 08:43 GMT+0
Fereydoun Abbasi, the former head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran
Fereydoun Abbasi, the former head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran

Iran’s nuclear facilities, research, and production are widely dispersed across the country, Tehran’s former atomic chief said Thursday, responding to US threats of military strikes if no new agreement is reached.

Fereydoun Abbasi, highlighting the history of Iran’s nuclear program, emphasized that “Nuclear knowledge in our country is distributed across both the educational and research sectors; it is not confined to the Atomic Energy Organization [AEO] or limited to specific facilities and sites associated with it. We are active in nuclear education and research nationwide.”

Abbasi is considered a political hardliner and was the head of AEO during populist President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad prior to 2013.

He dismissed President Donald Trump’s threats of strikes on Iran as “bluffing” and called his other statements about Greenland and Canada as “America’s excessive appetite.”

He noted that since mid-1970s, when the Atomic Center of the University of Tehran was transformed into the Atomic Energy Organization, “nuclear work in our country began to take an organized form, and its management came to be regarded as part of the country’s senior leadership. In other words, it moved beyond being merely an academic endeavor.”

He emphasized that AEO is at the level of a government department and its director is considered a presidential deputy. But he portrayed Iran’s nuclear activities as partly decentralized. “Nuclear knowledge in our country is distributed across both education and research sectors; it is not limited to the Atomic Energy Organization or confined to specific sites and facilities associated with it. We carry out nuclear education and research activities nationwide.”

At the same time Abbasi stressed that Iran is fully cooperation with UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and is subject to detailed inspections.

However, since 2021, Tehran has significantly restricted the international watchdog’s access to its sensitive uranium enrichment sites, while producing 60% enriched fissile material—far beyond what is needed for civilian purposes.

Abbasi noted that in case of a US attack, protecting nuclear sites will be vital and Iran should have strong air defenses. He said that the adversary is well aware of Iran’s capabilities, implying that Iran has strong air defenses. However, in October, Israel carried out air strikes on a series of Iranian targets including its Russian-made S-300 anti-air missile batteries. According to both Israeli and various media reports, most of the air defense network was destroyed in the attack.

Most Viewed

Ghalibaf defends Iran-US talks amid hardline backlash
1
INSIGHT

Ghalibaf defends Iran-US talks amid hardline backlash

2
VOICES FROM IRAN

Bread shortages, soaring prices strain households in Iran, residents say

3
ANALYSIS

From instability to influence: Pakistan’s pivotal role in US-Iran diplomacy

4
ANALYSIS

100 days on: why Iran’s January protests spread across social classes

5

War-hit homeowners feel abandoned as Iran’s reconstruction aid fades

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Is Iran entering its Gorbachev moment?
    INSIGHT

    Is Iran entering its Gorbachev moment?

  • Iran crackdown reaches cemeteries as graves of slain protesters defaced
    EXCLUSIVE

    Iran crackdown reaches cemeteries as graves of slain protesters defaced

  • Iran diplomacy wobbles as factions compete to avoid looking soft on US
    INSIGHT

    Iran diplomacy wobbles as factions compete to avoid looking soft on US

  • The politics of pink: how Iran uses cuteness to rebrand violence
    ANALYSIS

    The politics of pink: how Iran uses cuteness to rebrand violence

  • Bread shortages, soaring prices strain households in Iran, residents say
    VOICES FROM IRAN

    Bread shortages, soaring prices strain households in Iran, residents say

  • Ghalibaf defends Iran-US talks amid hardline backlash
    INSIGHT

    Ghalibaf defends Iran-US talks amid hardline backlash

•
•
•

More Stories

Iran open to full nuclear verification, president says

Apr 4, 2025, 07:52 GMT+1

Iran’s nuclear activities can be placed under full verification, President Masoud Pezeshkian told Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Thursday, amid continued US pressure for a ban on Tehran’s nuclear weapons development.

“It is possible to place the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear activities under full verification, as has been done in previous years,” Pezeshkian told the Saudi leader in their phone call.

He also said that Iran seeks dialogue and rejects any military use of nuclear energy.

“The Islamic Republic of Iran has never sought war or conflict, and non-peaceful use of nuclear energy has absolutely no place in our security and defense doctrine,” media in Tehran quoted him as saying.

“We are not seeking war with any country, but we have no hesitation in defending ourselves, and our readiness and capabilities in this regard are at the highest level,” Pezeshkian said, according to a statement from his office.

Pezeshkian also said that Iran is ready to engage in dialogue to reduce tensions based on mutual interests and respect, according to the statement.

In recent days, Tehran has signaled its willingness to engage in indirect talks with the Trump administration, while the US continues to favor quicker, direct negotiations.

“I think it’s better if we have direct talks,” Trump said on Thursday. “I think it goes faster, and you understand the other side a lot better than if you go through intermediaries. They wanted to use intermediaries. I don’t think that’s necessarily true anymore.”

It remains unclear whether Iran has genuinely shifted its position or if President Trump is merely speculating about Tehran’s intentions.

The US administration has continued to escalate sanctions on Iran, aiming to fully halt the country’s oil exports—especially to China. Trump has also threatened that if Tehran does not make concessions, it can become the target of military strikes.

Republican senators advocate Tehran 'regime change', economic pain

Apr 3, 2025, 19:16 GMT+1
•
Arash Aalaei

Two Republican senators told Iran International on Thursday that Washington must deploy economic pressure to cripple it Mideast adversary the Islamic Republic of Iran.

"Everything we can do to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon and ultimately to support regime change in Iran would be an improvement in US national security", Texas Senator Ted Cruz said.

"I think we have many points of leverage short of military action and economic and diplomatic pressure can have a profoundly powerful effect," he added. "The Ayatollah's intentions are unquestionably hostile. He is a theocratic genocidal lunatic."

Trump has threatened to bomb Iran if it does not reach a new nuclear accord. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has vowed retaliation in the event of an attack.

Previously, the populist US President who campaigned in part on avoiding foreign wars has said he wishes the Iranian people well and suggested he does not seek the overthrow of its theocratic rulers.

Trump in February reinstated the "maximum pressure" campaign of sanctions on Iran from his first term with the aim of bringing Iranian oil sales down to zero.

Tehran denies seeking nuclear weapons but the United Nations nuclear watchdog said it now possesses the largest stockpile of enriched uranium of any non-nuclear armed state.

Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama expressed support for increased pressure on Iran, emphasizing sanctions targeting key sectors like oil and gas.

“If you're going to put sanctions on somebody – what President Trump does—for Iran and for the regime that's even killing its own people—is, you do blockade," Tuberville told Iran International.

"You take away their source of being able to make a living, and that’s through their oil and gas."

Israeli FM says diplomacy still an option to prevent Iran developing nuclear weapons

Apr 3, 2025, 09:50 GMT+1

Israel's foreign minister said the country is not ruling out a diplomatic path to prevent Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon, adding that there were signs that there could be indirect talks between Tehran and the United States.

"We don't hold discussions with the Iranians, as you know, but they made it clear they are ready to an indirect negotiations with the US, and I will not be surprised if such negotiations will start," Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said on Thursday following a meeting with his French counterpart in Paris.

“What's important is the objective, and the objective is not to have Iran with nuclear weapon. I think it's international consensus, and we don't exclude the diplomatic path,” he added.

Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons, though hardliners are calling for the country's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to drop the religious ban on nuclear weapons, an argument that has gained pace in the wake of threats from US President Donald Trump.

Trump recently threatened to bomb Iran if a deal is not reached within a two month deadline, prompting a sharp response from Khamenei, who warned of a "heavy blow in return" if Iran were attacked. The exact start date of Trump's deadline to Iran remains unclear.

According to two US officials cited by Axios, the White House is seriously considering the Iranian proposal for indirect nuclear talks, even as the US military significantly increases its presence in the Middle East.

"Iran is a dangerous state with an extremist regime that works intensively against regional stability, exporting the Islamist revolution and spreading terrorism in the region," Saar said after the meeting with Jean-Noël Barrot.

Since October 7 when Iran-backed Hamas invaded Israel, killing 12,000 mostly civilians and taking more than 250 others hostage, Iran's allies have launched attacks on Israel from Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen.

"The most extremist regime in the world shouldn't possess the most dangerous weapon in the world," he added.

Along with the US, France was pivotal in securing the ceasefire between Israel and Iran's largest proxy, Hezbollah in Lebanon. Following the Lebanese militia's assault on Israel in allegiance with Hamas in Gaza, the archenemies came the closest to war since 2006 before the ceasefire which came into effect in November.

"We shouldn't allow Hezbollah to recover and rearm, and we will not let it happen," said Saar, as the fragile ceasefire continues amid allegations from both sides of breaches.

"Inside Lebanon, there is cooperation between Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas, and we will not allow terror activities from there against Israel and our civilians. We will not allow to come back to the reality of October 6th on any of Israel's borders."

On Tuesday, the Israeli military said it assassinated a Revolutionary Guards member coordinating Hamas and Hezbollah operations in Lebanon.

Hassan Ali Mahmoud Badir, a member of Hezbollah's Unit 3900 and the Revolutionary Guards Quds Force, was killed in the Dahiyeh area of Beirut, a stronghold of the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia.

"Badir recently operated in cooperation with the Hamas terrorist organization, directed Hamas terrorists, and assisted them in planning and advancing a significant and imminent terror attack against Israeli civilians," a statement released on Tuesday said.

"Given the immediacy of the threat, Badir was struck immediately in order to eliminate the threat posed by a terror attack intended to harm Israeli civilians."

Iran faces internal debate over building nuclear weapons

Apr 3, 2025, 07:32 GMT+1
•
Maryam Sinaiee

Remarks by a senior adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader warning of Iran being pushed to produce nuclear weapons by US threats have sparked intense debate in Iran.

In a televised interview on Monday, Ali Larijani suggested that if Iran were attacked and public demand for nuclear weapons emerged, even the Supreme Leader’s religious decree (fatwa) against weapons of mass destruction could be reconsidered. Nonetheless, he insisted that Iran is not pursuing nuclear arms and remains committed to cooperating with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Khamenei’s ruling was presented by Iranian officials at the International Conference on Nuclear Disarmament in April 2010. But such religious decrees could be altered or overturned given the ‘requirement of time and place’ as many historical instances prove.

Many hardliners and ultra-hardliners in Tehran—typically staunch critics of the moderate conservative Larijani—have embraced his remarks on social media.

“Had any other political figure raised the possibility of the Islamic Republic moving toward nuclear weapons, they would have been accused of warmongering or bluffing. Dr. Larijani’s decision to bring it up was a wise move and a timely act of sacrifice,” wrote Vahid Yaminpour, a prominent ultra-hardliner and former state television executive, on X.

“The Iranian nation wants nuclear weapons,” declared Seyed Komail, an ultra-hardliner social media activist with 27,000 followers, in response to Larijani’s remarks.

Abdollah Ganji, former editor of the IRGC-linked Javan newspaper, dismissed concerns over potential US or Israeli strikes, arguing that Iran’s nuclear facilities are too deeply fortified to be destroyed. He warned that an attack could lead to Iran's withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and retaliation against US military bases and Israel.

However, Larijani’s remarks stand in contrast to official government positions. Soon after his interview, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reaffirmed on X that Iran “under no circumstances” would seek, develop, or acquire nuclear weapons, emphasizing that diplomacy remains the best course of action.

Nour News, an online outlet believed to be affiliated with Iran’s Supreme National Security Council (SNSC), also weighed in, questioning whether the US is prepared to face the consequences of further escalation.

Larijani’s statements have drawn strong criticism as well. Detractors argue that such rhetoric provides the US and Israel with an excuse to justify pre-emptive military action. “The Leader’s fatwa prohibiting nuclear weapons is absolute and without exceptions,” posted cleric Saeed Ebrahimi on X, adding that raising the prospect of nuclear bombs would only give Iran's enemies justification for aggression.

Mohammad Rahbari, a prominent political commentator in Tehran, suggested that Larijani’s remarks signaled Iran may be alarmingly close to nuclear capability—precisely the kind of pretext Israel has been seeking for a preemptive strike. Senior reformist journalist Mohammad Sahafi also warned that such nuclear posturing could alienate potential allies who might otherwise support Iran in the face of Western pressure.

“Larijani's comment was unprofessional and came from a position of weakness; it had no merit. It also gave the other side an excuse to have strong reasons for pre-emptive action and to shape a global consensus. In short, if we are concerned about our homeland, we should not take such a reckless stance,” Hemmat Imani, an international relations researcher in Iran, wrote.

Others speculate that Larijani’s remarks are part of ongoing indirect negotiations with Washington. “Ali Larijani’s ‘warning’ should be seen as a calculated move in high-level negotiations,” suggested Iranian environmental journalist Sina Jahani.

Describing Larijani’s remarks as “a form of nuclear blackmail the Islamic Republic has used as a tool of threat for years,” Arvand Amir-Khosravi, a Norway-based academic and monarchist, wrote on X that the threat was “nothing more than a propaganda ploy to gain leverage in potential negotiations,” adding that pursuing nuclear weapons would invite military retaliation rather than enhance Iran’s security.

The United States Office of the Director of National Intelligence reported in November 2024 that, as of September 26, Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon. However, last month, Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), described Iran’s nuclear program as extremely ambitious and wide-ranging. He warned that the country's uranium enrichment had reached near weapons-grade levels and was alarmingly close to the threshold for acquiring nuclear weapons.

'Great': US envoy answers Iran's top diplomat in cryptic, deleted post

Apr 2, 2025, 21:46 GMT+1

US President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff reacted "great" on Wednesday to a spirited statement by Iran's foreign minister on X before swiftly deleting the post.

It was not immediately clear if the expunged monosyllable, which marks the first public interaction between Tehran and the Trump administration, was meant in earnest, irony or error.

Witkoff's office did not immediately respond to an Iran International request for comment.

Tensions between Tehran and Washington have ramped up in recent days after Trump mooted bombing the country.

Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had written four paragraphs lamenting Washington's exit from a nuclear deal and recent talk of attacking Iran.

"10 years after signing the JCPOA—and 7 years after the US unilaterally walked away from it—there is not ONE SHRED OF PROOF that Iran has violated this commitment," Araghchi wrote, referring to a 2015 agreement from which the United States withdrew in Trump's first term.

"Diplomatic engagement worked in the past and can still work. BUT, it should be clear to all that there is—by definition—no such thing as a 'military option' let alone a 'military solution'," he added.

Witkoff, who has spearheaded talks for Trump in Israel-Hamas and Ukraine-Russia conflicts as part of the populist President's bid to wind down foreign reports, replied simply: "Great".

Within minutes, the reply was deleted from Witkoff's account.

The post came weeks after after a leaked chat among senior administration officials including Witkoff about plans for an imminent attack on the Iran-aligned Houthi group in Yemen sparked consternation in Washington among Trump's opponents.

Critics said the inclusion of a prominent journalist in the group and the discussion of sensitive military plans on a commercial chat app, Signal, endangered national security and revealed too much about official thinking and intelligence sources.

Trump on Sunday warned that Iran could face bombing and secondary tariffs if a nuclear deal was not reached with Washington. The remarks prompted a sharp riposte from Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who warned of a "heavy blow in return" if Iran were attacked.

Trump had previously reached out to Khamenei in the form of a personal letter in an attempt to explore a new nuclear agreement and prevent military escalation, Witkoff said late last month.

"We don't need to solve everything militarily," Witkoff told Fox News.

"Our signal to Iran is let's sit down and see if we can, through dialogue, through diplomacy, get to the right place. If we can, we are prepared to do that. And if we can't, the alternative is not a great alternative."