• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

WSJ Slams Reported US Plans For A Limited Deal With Iran

Jun 17, 2023, 10:28 GMT+1Updated: 12:07 GMT+1
President Joe Biden greets Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT), a supporter of the Iran nuclear deal, on June 16, 2023
President Joe Biden greets Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT), a supporter of the Iran nuclear deal, on June 16, 2023

The Wall Street Editorial Board has slammed reported plans by the Biden administration to reach a limited nuclear deal with Iran in exchange for billions of dollars.

In an editorial on Friday, WSJ said the reported deal taking shape is not what President Joe Biden promised when he embarked on talks with the Islamic Republic in early 2021.

Biden had promised a “longer and stronger” agreement, the Journal said, “Now, in a remarkable retreat, the Biden Administration is pursuing an unwritten ‚understanding‘ with Iran to get to the brink of a nuclear breakout but go no further.“

The Biden administration has denied any deals with Iran, acknowledging that contacts were made to convey US demands. The latest denial came from Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Friday during a press conference.

“With regard to Iran, some of the reports that we’ve seen about an agreement on nuclear matters or, for that matter, on detainees are simply not accurate and not true,” Blinken said.

The WSJ says that in the deal taking shape Iran will keep all of its 60-percent enriched uranium, without clarity about international monitoring of its nuclear activities, while Tehran can break the unwritten “understanding” over any issue in the future.

The editorial also criticized a deal earlier this month that allows Iraq to release $2.7 billion of Iran’s frozen funds ostensibly for spending mainly on food imports.

"The Administration says Iran will spend the Iraqi funds only on food and medicine, as if money isn’t fungible. In reality the U.S. is freeing up billions of dollars that will finance the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and its imperialism across the Middle East," the editorial said.

Most Viewed

Why Trump said no to Iran’s Hormuz proposal
1
ANALYSIS

Why Trump said no to Iran’s Hormuz proposal

2

Tehran seeks negotiated way out as Washington maintains pressure

3
OPINION

Iran’s oil industry has too many masters

4

Hormuz oil flows rise despite Iran threats against shipping

5

Iran wrong to expect midterms to restrain Trump, former US official says

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Why Trump said no to Iran’s Hormuz proposal
    ANALYSIS

    Why Trump said no to Iran’s Hormuz proposal

  • Iran’s oil industry has too many masters
    OPINION

    Iran’s oil industry has too many masters

  • Iran wrong to expect midterms to restrain Trump, former US official says

    Iran wrong to expect midterms to restrain Trump, former US official says

  • Trump may be buying time on Iran until after the midterms
    PODCAST

    Trump may be buying time on Iran until after the midterms

  • Pezeshkian’s Fox News nuclear overture draws hardline backlash
    INSIGHT

    Pezeshkian’s Fox News nuclear overture draws hardline backlash

  • US and Iran want a deal, but neither wants to move first
    ANALYSIS

    US and Iran want a deal, but neither wants to move first

Banner
Banner